Friday, December 5, 2014

Predujuce or Plead?


Recently there have been two high profile cases recently where the grand jury has declined to charge white police officers for the killings of African American civilians. And how, one might wonder, has the United States managed to imprison more than two million people if grand juries can’t find probable cause for murder or even manslaughter in two such straightforward cases, where the identities of those who killed and the means of death were clear?

The first incident that for the most part erupted the recent racism riots was the case of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri where he was shot unarmed by a white police officer. The second major incident was Eric Garner of Staten Island who had repeatedly pleaded that he couldn't breathe while an officer held him in a chokehold, which is itself barred by NYPD rules.

For those hoping to see officers who kill unarmed people at least publicly tried, there are likely more disappointments in store. Tamir Rice was 12 years old when police shot and killed him last month within two seconds of their car's approaching him. Akai Gurley also died last month, shot by a New York officer in what the police say was an accident.

Just a few days ago, a grand jury in Jasper, Texas, declined to indict two white officers who had brutally beaten a black woman on video. They had arrested her for an unpaid ticket, though she had been making monthly payments.

The real question here is: Is this a flaw in our police system and the result of a prejudice society? Or, is this just the kind of thing that black people in the American society have needed for years to express their pleads of unjust? Could this door of racism open two ways?

Much like the case in Ferguson MO, an unarmed man was shot by a police officer. What is the difference between the cases? The officer was BLACK and the victim was WHITE. Therefore, he deserves no media attention right? The victim was 20 year old Dillon Taylor, whom family and friends say was unarmed at the time of the shooting, was shot and killed by a police officer in Salt Lake City, UT. According to Police Chief Chris Burbank, the shooting was caught on the officer’s body camera, but he did not say whether Taylor was armed at the time of the shooting. Police reportedly arrived on scene because of a “man waving a gun around.” Taylor must have matched the description of the suspect, but witnesses claim that he may have been pulling up his pants, causing the officer to think he was drawing a weapon.

Dillon’s brother Jerrail explains in an interview: “He couldn’t hear them,  he had headphones on, so he just kept walking. Then … they had guns pointed at his face. That’s when he turned off the music,” he said. “I saw them point guns at my brother’s face, and I knew what was going to happen.” The officer told Dillon Taylor to get on the ground and to put his hands on his head. “He got confused, he went to pull up his pants to get on the ground, and they shot him,” Jerrail Taylor said. He didn’t have a weapon, he didn’t attack or confront officers in any way, and he just tried to pull his pants up a little bit so he could get on the ground comfortably. Dillon Taylor was shot twice and died at the scene. By law cops need to see a weapon, or at least what they think is one, before they use deadly force.

The investigation in Salt Lake City, Utah into the officer’s conduct will continue without a riot and looters, without distractions from the DOJ, without race baiting. It will be conducted as all investigations are, much like Ferguson, Missouri should have been. While national news media continue to focus on race in Ferguson, Missouri, where a white police officer shot and killed an unarmed black teenager, they apparently don’t think a similar case in Utah with the races reversed is that newsworthy.

In March 2014 a black officer pulled over a white 70 year old disabled war vet, whom he asked to exit the vehicle. The man opened his door reaching for his cane he was shot by the officer who supposedly thought he was reaching for a weapon. Why did nobody hear about this? Unarmed white people who get shot by police just do not become national news.

What do all of these cases have in common? They have everything but the color of the skin between the officers and victims. In all of these cases the police officers felt that their life was in danger.  I don’t care what you watch, hear, or see in the news. You CANNOT and WILL NOT understand what it was like to be in the shoes of those police officers. It is easy to get caught up in the hype of the media and pick a side from the outside looking in. But what was going through those police officers minds will never be understood by the common civilian. If it was your job to protect society, make sure your children’s father, or your wife’s husband came home safely at the end of the day, what would you do to make that happen? What would you do to protect your own life?

I do not feel to the slightest degree that these homicides are an issue of racism by white people or vice versa. This war of prejudice will never end until we let ourselves be enslaved by African Americans. This of course will never happen, so the score will never be completely even. There will ALWAYS be those people who feel like they have been mistreated. All or most of which, don’t know anyone who was a slave, just as we don’t know anyone who owned slaves. We cannot change history or change what our ancestors did, but I guess we can be blamed for it.

 

 

Work Cited:



 

9 comments:

  1. Actually a very good point on white enslavement. I had not considered that angle before. Nice job for making me think:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good blog (Big)Wendy. I agree with your ideas especially that there will always be those people who will feel like they have been mistreated. Also I agree that we can't change history or change what our ancestors did.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked this blog. I agree with you, people need to watch what they do and who they do to certain people.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree completely that people should watch what they do and how they do it or who they do it with

    ReplyDelete
  5. I like how you stated that when a white man is killed by a black police officer that it does not get news but the other way around it is national headlines. I disagree with that all these people were innocent at the times of these shootings. If they were innocent why would there be confrontation in the first place?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The media is going to tell you that all these people were perfect Christians. They would not get as high ratings if they gave the whole story. I'm sure that all these people were not just walking down the street and all of the sudden a cop pulls up and uses them as target practice. You cannot be that naïve.

      Delete
    2. If you would stop being so lazy and actually read my blog to make a legitimate factual comment you would see that I in no point in time said that these black victims were INNOCENT. NOT ONCE. I said they were UNARMED. WHICH THEY WERE. I actually included a paragraph defending the police officers decision due to feeling their life was in danger. READ THE BLOG BEFORE MAKING FALSE ACCUSATIONS.

      Delete
  6. I agree with JC3#8140. Those people were not just bystanders, they were there for a reason. I like how you said that if the roles were switched that we would not have heard anything about it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete